Item Details

Empathy Assessment and the Prediction of Social Behavior: Development and Validation of the Social-Emotions Task (SET) for the Measurement of Empathy and Theory of Mind

Schaefer, Hillary Sunshine
Format
Thesis/Dissertation; Online
Author
Schaefer, Hillary Sunshine
Advisor
Nosek, Brian
Abstract
Empathy is a complex ability requiring a series of prerequisite skills: an emotion must be recognized, a cause inferred, and the perceiver experiences some of the observed emotion (Decety & Jackson, 2004). Poor empathy can result from a disruption in one of these multiple components; consequently, populations with otherwise disparate symptoms can show empathic deficits (Blair, 2008). Many negative consequences are associated with poor empathy, including social deficits and increased violence risk (e.g. Riggio et. al, 1989; Sallquist et. al, 2009). Current assessments of empathy fail to account for its multiple components, rely entirely on self-report, or have been limited to validation in a single population. Clinical and forensic assessments often excessively call on clinical judgment to assess empathy, which is less accurate than statistical or taskbased measures (Dames, Faust & Meehl, 1989), or worse, neglect to evaluate social functioning entirely due to the lack of a reliable measure. The current project introduces and develops a test of empathic capacity and social cognition – called the SocialEmotions Task (SET) – that aims to be useful in research and clinical contexts across multiple populations in the prediction of outcomes such as antisocial behavior and community success. Results show that SET performance is associated positively with good social functioning and negatively with antisocial behaviors and psychopathic traits. Further, it outperforms other empathy measures in the prediction of these outcomes. Using a game-like adaptation of the SET, individuals with implicit racial bias showed poor empathy for angry, Black males. The SET shows promise as a test of empathic capacity and future work aims to validate it in additional populations. Note: Abstract extracted from PDF text
Language
English
Date Received
20140123
Published
University of Virginia, Department of Psychology, PHD (Doctor of Philosophy), 2013
Published Date
2013-04-01
Degree
PHD (Doctor of Philosophy)
Collection
Libra ETD Repository
Logo for In CopyrightIn Copyright

Availability

Read Online