Item Details

Print View

What I Want Versus What Is Right: Does Dispositional Motivation for Objectivity Versus Subjectivity Influence Judgment?

Hawkins, Carlee Beth
Format
Thesis/Dissertation; Online
Author
Hawkins, Carlee Beth
Advisor
Nosek, Brian
Abstract
Human decision-making is influenced by at least two reasoning motivations – directional goals to achieve desired conclusions, and accuracy goals to achieve correct or objective conclusions (Kunda, 1990). Biased processing toward directional (subjective) goals occurs relatively effortlessly, but situational factors, such as having to justify one's decision, motivate people to overcome bias and pursue more objective decision-making and behavior. In this dissertation, I investigated whether this motivation varies dispositionally across individuals, and whether that variation predicts social and political judgments. In seven studies, the Motivation for Objectivity versus Subjectivity Scale (MOSS) was developed and validated. The factor structure and reliability of the MOSS was confirmed across three samples: undergraduate students (Studies 1, 5, & 6), Project Implicit volunteers (Studies 2-4), and Mechanical Turk workers (Study 7). The MOSS demonstrated convergent and discriminant validity (Studies 1 & 4), predictive validity for political judgment (Study 2) and social judgment and behavior (Studies 5 & 6), and showed, at most, a mild effect of socially desirable responding (Studies 1& 4). Note: Abstract extracted from PDF text
Language
English
Published
University of Virginia, Department of Psychology, PHD, 2013
Published Date
2013-05-01
Degree
PHD
Collection
Libra ETD Repository
In CopyrightIn Copyright
▾See more
▴See less

Availability

Read Online