Item Details

Print View

Blind Collaborative Justice Survey, 2014 [UNITED STATES] [electronic resource]

Carolyn Wong, Eyal Aharoni
Format
Computer Resource; Online; Dataset
Published
Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2017
Edition
2017-06-29
Series
ICPSR
ICPSR (Series)
Access Restriction
AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
Abstract

These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they there received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except of the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompany readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collections and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed.

This study conducted an experimental investigation of two potential contributors to invalid testimony within adversarial litigation involving forensic evidence. First, the experts' knowledge of their party representation (i.e., prosecution vs. defense counsel), and secondly the lack of input from the relevant scientific community. The study used an experimental survey design with a realistic criminal case to examine the effects of blinding experts to their party representation and consensus feedback from a panel of experts to quantify and reduce testimonial bias.

Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35258.v1
Contents
Dataset
Description
Mode of access: Intranet.
Notes
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2017-06-30.
Series Statement
ICPSR 35258
ICPSR (Series) 35258
Other Forms
Also available as downloadable files.
Copyright Not EvaluatedCopyright Not Evaluated
Technical Details
  • Staff View

    LEADER 02839cmm a2200421la 4500
    001 ICPSR35258
    003 MiAaI
    006 m f a u
    007 cr mn mmmmuuuu
    008 170630s2017 miu f a eng d
    035
      
      
    a| (MiAaI)ICPSR35258
    040
      
      
    a| MiAaI c| MiAaI
    245
    0
    0
    a| Blind Collaborative Justice Survey, 2014 [UNITED STATES] h| [electronic resource] c| Carolyn Wong, Eyal Aharoni
    250
      
      
    a| 2017-06-29
    260
      
      
    a| Ann Arbor, Mich. b| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] c| 2017
    490
      
      
    a| ICPSR v| 35258
    516
      
      
    a| Numeric
    538
      
      
    a| Mode of access: Intranet.
    500
      
      
    a| Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2017-06-30.
    536
      
      
    a| United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice c| 2013-IJ-CX-0002
    506
      
      
    a| AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
    530
      
      
    a| Also available as downloadable files.
    522
      
      
    a| United States
    520
    3
      
    a| <p> These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they there received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except of the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompany readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collections and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. </p> <p> This study conducted an experimental investigation of two potential contributors to invalid testimony within adversarial litigation involving forensic evidence. First, the experts' knowledge of their party representation (i.e., prosecution vs. defense counsel), and secondly the lack of input from the relevant scientific community. The study used an experimental survey design with a realistic criminal case to examine the effects of blinding experts to their party representation and consensus feedback from a panel of experts to quantify and reduce testimonial bias. </p>Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35258.v1
    505
      
      
    t| Dataset
    567
      
      
    a| People with an advanced degree in a relevant scientific field where training would normally include exposure to Bayes theorem or equivalent experience.
    650
      
    7
    a| expert witnesses 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| forensic sciences 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| trial procedures 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| trials 2| icpsr
    653
    0
      
    a| ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System
    653
    0
      
    a| NACJD XVI. Fast Release
    653
    0
      
    a| NACJD XV. Forensics
    700
    2
      
    a| Wong, Carolyn u| RAND Corporation
    700
    2
      
    a| Aharoni, Eyal u| RAND Corporation
    710
    2
      
    a| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
    830
      
    0
    a| ICPSR (Series) v| 35258
    856
    4
    0
    u| http://proxy01.its.virginia.edu/login?url=http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35258.v1
    999
      
      
    w| WEB l| INTERNET m| UVA-LIB t| INTERNET
▾See more
▴See less

Availability

Access Online