Item Details

Print View

Survey of Child Care Subsidy Recipients in New York City, June 2008-July 2009 [electronic resource]

Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Anne Martin
Format
Computer Resource; Online; Dataset
Published
Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2012
Edition
2012-08-06
Series
ICPSR
ICPSR (Series)
Access Restriction
AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
Abstract

The goal of this project was to explore associations among parental preferences for child care, parents' perceptions of care quality, subsidy policies, and the care arrangements that low-income working families in New York City use for their young children. The project relied on two data sources: (1) New York City administrative data on the entire population of subsidy recipients between January 2006 and December 2008 with children age six and younger to describe families' child care arrangements, and (2) a phone survey with a random sample of 2,045 families drawn from the administrative data and collected in two different waves. The first wave of data collection occurred between June 2008 and January 2009, the second wave occurred between February and July 2009. Due to the short interval between waves, no cohort effect was expected and the waves were merged into a single analytic sample, but the variable labels differentiate between the waves for future analysis.

Survey questions covered current child care arrangements, preferences for child care arrangements, satisfaction with subsidies, and experiences with subsidy enrollment and recertification. The administrative data were used to calculate the number and length of spells of subsidy use over the 36-month period. Children are classified according to subsidy mechanism (contract vs voucher) and population (public assistance vs low-income). Weights were created so survey respondents would generalize to the population of subsidy recipients as of February 2008 (including multiple children per family).

Using these data, the project aimed to answer four research questions:

  1. What are the dynamics of subsidy use? What is the duration of subsidy use?
  2. Is there a mismatch between parents' stated preferences for child care and the care that they actually use? What are the policy barriers that potentially prevent families from accessing the care that they prefer? Are there specific barriers faced by families who received vouchers (as opposed to those who receive care in a contracted setting) that affect their use of formal care?
  3. Are parental preferences for child care differentially associated with the use of formal versus informal care? How are parental perceptions of child care quality and parental work characteristics associated with the use of formal or informal care?
  4. Does the continuity of care depend on whether the care is informal or formal?
  5. Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32481.v1
Contents
  • Survey of Child Care Subsidy Recipients in New York City, June 2008-July 2009 (subsidy type stratum at time of survey)
  • Survey of Child Care Subsidy Recipients in New York City, June 2008-July 2009 (age stratum at time of survey)
Description
Mode of access: Intranet.
Notes
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2016-02-11.
Series Statement
ICPSR 32481
ICPSR (Series) 32481
Other Forms
Also available as downloadable files.
Copyright Not EvaluatedCopyright Not Evaluated
Technical Details
  • Staff View

    LEADER 05369cmm a2200577la 4500
    001 ICPSR32481
    003 MiAaI
    006 m f a u
    007 cr mn mmmmuuuu
    008 160211s2012 miu f a eng d
    035
      
      
    a| (MiAaI)ICPSR32481
    040
      
      
    a| MiAaI c| MiAaI
    245
    0
    0
    a| Survey of Child Care Subsidy Recipients in New York City, June 2008-July 2009 h| [electronic resource] c| Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Anne Martin
    250
      
      
    a| 2012-08-06
    260
      
      
    a| Ann Arbor, Mich. b| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] c| 2012
    490
      
      
    a| ICPSR v| 32481
    516
      
      
    a| Numeric
    538
      
      
    a| Mode of access: Intranet.
    500
      
      
    a| Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2016-02-11.
    536
      
      
    a| United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation c| 90YE095
    506
      
      
    a| AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
    530
      
      
    a| Also available as downloadable files.
    522
      
      
    a| New York City
    522
      
      
    a| United States
    520
    3
      
    a| <p>The goal of this project was to explore associations among parental preferences for child care, parents' perceptions of care quality, subsidy policies, and the care arrangements that low-income working families in New York City use for their young children. The project relied on two data sources: (1) New York City administrative data on the entire population of subsidy recipients between January 2006 and December 2008 with children age six and younger to describe families' child care arrangements, and (2) a phone survey with a random sample of 2,045 families drawn from the administrative data and collected in two different waves. The first wave of data collection occurred between June 2008 and January 2009, the second wave occurred between February and July 2009. Due to the short interval between waves, no cohort effect was expected and the waves were merged into a single analytic sample, but the variable labels differentiate between the waves for future analysis.</p> <p>Survey questions covered current child care arrangements, preferences for child care arrangements, satisfaction with subsidies, and experiences with subsidy enrollment and recertification. The administrative data were used to calculate the number and length of spells of subsidy use over the 36-month period. Children are classified according to subsidy mechanism (contract vs voucher) and population (public assistance vs low-income). Weights were created so survey respondents would generalize to the population of subsidy recipients as of February 2008 (including multiple children per family).</p> <p>Using these data, the project aimed to answer four research questions:</p><list type="ordered"> <itm>What are the dynamics of subsidy use? What is the duration of subsidy use?</itm> <itm>Is there a mismatch between parents' stated preferences for child care and the care that they actually use? What are the policy barriers that potentially prevent families from accessing the care that they prefer? Are there specific barriers faced by families who received vouchers (as opposed to those who receive care in a contracted setting) that affect their use of formal care?</itm> <itm>Are parental preferences for child care differentially associated with the use of formal versus informal care? How are parental perceptions of child care quality and parental work characteristics associated with the use of formal or informal care?</itm> <itm>Does the continuity of care depend on whether the care is informal or formal?</itm></list>Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32481.v1
    505
      
      
    t| Survey of Child Care Subsidy Recipients in New York City, June 2008-July 2009 (subsidy type stratum at time of survey)
    505
      
      
    t| Survey of Child Care Subsidy Recipients in New York City, June 2008-July 2009 (age stratum at time of survey)
    567
      
      
    a| Children up to six years of age with contact information (i.e. address, phone number) who received a child care subsidy in New York City in February 2008.
    650
      
    7
    a| caregivers 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| child care 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| child welfare 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| welfare services 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| working mothers 2| icpsr
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC II. Parents and Families
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC III.E. Economic and Societal Impact
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC IV. Child Care and Early Education Providers/Organizations
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC III.A. Access To Child Care and Early Education
    653
    0
      
    a| ICPSR V.A. Education, United States
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC II.A. Selection Of Child Care and Early Education Arrangements
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC II.B. Child Care and Early Education Expenses
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC III.B. Demand and Supply/Needs Assessment
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC III.C. Cost Of Providing Services
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC IV.A. Provider Type/Setting
    653
    0
      
    a| ICPSR V. Education
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC III. Child Care and Early Education Market
    653
    0
      
    a| CCEERC IV.B. Sponsorship
    700
    2
      
    a| Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne u| Columbia University. Teachers College
    700
    2
      
    a| Martin, Anne u| Columbia University. Teachers College
    710
    2
      
    a| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
    830
      
    0
    a| ICPSR (Series) v| 32481
    856
    4
    0
    u| http://proxy01.its.virginia.edu/login?url=http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32481.v1
    999
      
      
    w| WEB l| INTERNET m| UVA-LIB t| INTERNET
▾See more
▴See less

Availability

Access Online