Item Details

Print View

Survey Study of 43 Supreme Court Common Law Judges on the Use of Foreign Law in Constitutional Rights Cases [electronic resource]

Brian Flanagan, Sinead Ahern
Format
Computer Resource; Online
Published
Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 2010
Edition
2010-08-31
Series
ICPSR
ICPSR (Series)
Access Restriction
AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
Abstract
This is a survey study of 43 judges from the British House of Lords, the Caribbean Court of Justice, the High Court of Australia, and the Supreme Courts of Ireland, India, Israel, South Africa, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States on the use of foreign law in constitutional rights cases. As the focus of attempts to both explain and justify the use of foreign law in constitutional discourse, the attitudes of apex judges are clearly at issue. The study aims to shed light on how common law judges view foreign law as a source of argument in constitutional rights matters, and how they "see" transnational sources. The data provide the basis for preliminary testing of globalist theory (associated with Anne-Marie Slaughter, Vicki Jackson and Chris McCrudden). More generally, they lend a practical insight to jurisprudential debates invoking the nature of judicial reasoning in appellate courts. We find that the conception of judges citing foreign law as a source of persuasive authority is of limited application. Citational opportunism and the aspiration to membership of an emerging international "guild" appear to be equally important strands in judicial attitudes towards foreign law. We argue that their presence is at odds with Ronald Dworkin's theory of legal objectivity, and revealed in a manner meeting his own methodological standard for attitudinal research.Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29121.v1
Contents
Dataset
Description
Mode of access: Intranet.
Notes
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2016-02-11.
Series Statement
ICPSR 29121
ICPSR (Series) 29121
Other Forms
Also available as downloadable files.
Copyright Not EvaluatedCopyright Not Evaluated
Technical Details
  • Staff View

    LEADER 03460cmm a2200565la 4500
    001 ICPSR29121
    003 MiAaI
    006 m f a u
    007 cr mn mmmmuuuu
    008 160211s2010 miu f a eng d
    035
      
      
    a| (MiAaI)ICPSR29121
    040
      
      
    a| MiAaI c| MiAaI
    245
    0
    0
    a| Survey Study of 43 Supreme Court Common Law Judges on the Use of Foreign Law in Constitutional Rights Cases h| [electronic resource] c| Brian Flanagan, Sinead Ahern
    250
      
      
    a| 2010-08-31
    260
      
      
    a| Ann Arbor, Mich. b| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] c| 2010
    490
      
      
    a| ICPSR v| 29121
    516
      
      
    a| Numeric
    538
      
      
    a| Mode of access: Intranet.
    500
      
      
    a| Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2016-02-11.
    536
      
      
    a| University College Dublin. Ad Astra Research Scholarship
    506
      
      
    a| AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
    530
      
      
    a| Also available as downloadable files.
    522
      
      
    a| Australia
    522
      
      
    a| Canada
    522
      
      
    a| Global
    522
      
      
    a| India
    522
      
      
    a| Ireland
    522
      
      
    a| Israel
    522
      
      
    a| New Zealand
    522
      
      
    a| South Africa
    522
      
      
    a| United Kingdom
    522
      
      
    a| United States
    520
    3
      
    a| This is a survey study of 43 judges from the British House of Lords, the Caribbean Court of Justice, the High Court of Australia, and the Supreme Courts of Ireland, India, Israel, South Africa, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States on the use of foreign law in constitutional rights cases. As the focus of attempts to both explain and justify the use of foreign law in constitutional discourse, the attitudes of apex judges are clearly at issue. The study aims to shed light on how common law judges view foreign law as a source of argument in constitutional rights matters, and how they "see" transnational sources. The data provide the basis for preliminary testing of globalist theory (associated with Anne-Marie Slaughter, Vicki Jackson and Chris McCrudden). More generally, they lend a practical insight to jurisprudential debates invoking the nature of judicial reasoning in appellate courts. We find that the conception of judges citing foreign law as a source of persuasive authority is of limited application. Citational opportunism and the aspiration to membership of an emerging international "guild" appear to be equally important strands in judicial attitudes towards foreign law. We argue that their presence is at odds with Ronald Dworkin's theory of legal objectivity, and revealed in a manner meeting his own methodological standard for attitudinal research.Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29121.v1
    505
      
      
    t| Dataset
    567
      
      
    a| Approximately 43 supreme court common law judges.
    650
      
    7
    a| appellate courts 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| civil rights 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| constitutional law 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| foreign courts 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| foreign judicial systems 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| judges 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| judicial review 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| Supreme Court decisions 2| icpsr
    653
    0
      
    a| ICPSR XVIII. Replication Datasets
    653
    0
      
    a| IDRC VIII. International Organizations
    700
    2
      
    a| Flanagan, Brian u| National University of Ireland-Maynooth
    700
    2
      
    a| Ahern, Sinead u| University of Limerick
    710
    2
      
    a| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
    830
      
    0
    a| ICPSR (Series) v| 29121
    856
    4
    0
    u| http://proxy.its.virginia.edu/login?url=http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR29121.v1
    999
      
      
    w| WEB l| INTERNET m| UVA-LIB t| INTERNET
▾See more
▴See less

Availability

Access Online