Item Details

Print View

Multisite Evaluation of Shock Incarceration [electronic resource]: [Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas], 1987-1992

Doris Layton MacKenzie
Format
Computer Resource; Online; Dataset
Published
Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1998
Edition
2006-03-30
Series
ICPSR
ICPSR (Series)
Access Restriction
AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
Abstract
This study analyzes shock incarceration (boot camp) programs in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas. In each state, offenders who participated in boot camps were compared with demographically similar offenders who were sentenced to prison, probation, or parole. The impact of shock incarceration on offenders was assessed in two major areas: (1) changes in offenders' attitudes, expectations, and outlook during incarceration (self-report/attitude data), and (2) performance during and adjustment to community supervision after incarceration (community supervision data). The self-report/attitude data include variables measuring criminal history, drinking and drug abuse, and attitudes toward the shock incarceration program, as well as demographic variables, such as age, race, employment, income, education, and military experience. The community supervision data contain information on offenders' behaviors during community supervision, such as arrests, absconding incidents, jail time, drug use, education and employment experiences, financial and residential stability, and contacts with community supervision officers, along with demographic variables, such as age and race. In addition to these key areas, more detailed data were collected in Louisiana, including a psychological assessment, a risk and needs assessment, and a community supervision follow-up at two different time periods (Parts 11-18). For most states, the subjects sampled in the self-report/attitude survey were different from those who were surveyed in the community supervision phase of data collection. Data collection practices and sample structures differed by state, and therefore the data files are organized to explore the impact of shock incarceration at the state level. For each state, the unit of analysis is the offender.Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06986.v1
Contents
  • Florida Self-Report/Attitude Data
  • Georgia Self-Report/Attitude Data
  • South Carolina Self-Report/Attitude Data
  • Oklahoma Self-Report/Attitude Data
  • Florida Community Supervision Data
  • Georgia Community Supervision Data
  • South Carolina Community Supervision Data
  • Oklahoma Community Supervision Data
  • Illinois Community Supervision Data
  • Texas Community Supervision Data
  • Louisiana Demographic Records for Community Supervision Data
  • Louisiana Demographic Records for Self-Report Data
  • Louisiana Psychological Data
  • Louisiana Self-Report Data
  • Louisiana Attitude Data
  • Louisiana Risk/Needs Assessment Data
  • Louisiana One-Year Community Supervision Follow-Up Data
  • Louisiana Two-Year Community Supervision Follow-Up Data
Description
Mode of access: Intranet.
Notes
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2016-02-11.
Series Statement
ICPSR 6986
ICPSR (Series) 6986
Other Forms
Also available as downloadable files.
Copyright Not EvaluatedCopyright Not Evaluated
Technical Details
  • Staff View

    LEADER 04972cmm a2200745la 4500
    001 ICPSR06986
    003 MiAaI
    006 m f a u
    007 cr mn mmmmuuuu
    008 160211s1998 miu f a eng d
    035
      
      
    a| (MiAaI)ICPSR06986
    040
      
      
    a| MiAaI c| MiAaI
    245
    0
    0
    a| Multisite Evaluation of Shock Incarceration h| [electronic resource] b| [Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas], 1987-1992 c| Doris Layton MacKenzie
    250
      
      
    a| 2006-03-30
    260
      
      
    a| Ann Arbor, Mich. b| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] c| 1998
    490
      
      
    a| ICPSR v| 6986
    516
      
      
    a| Numeric
    538
      
      
    a| Mode of access: Intranet.
    500
      
      
    a| Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2016-02-11.
    536
      
      
    a| United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. National Institute of Justice c| 90-DD-CX-0061
    506
      
      
    a| AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
    530
      
      
    a| Also available as downloadable files.
    522
      
      
    a| Florida
    522
      
      
    a| Georgia
    522
      
      
    a| Illinois
    522
      
      
    a| Louisiana
    522
      
      
    a| Oklahoma
    522
      
      
    a| South Carolina
    522
      
      
    a| Texas
    522
      
      
    a| United States
    520
    3
      
    a| This study analyzes shock incarceration (boot camp) programs in Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas. In each state, offenders who participated in boot camps were compared with demographically similar offenders who were sentenced to prison, probation, or parole. The impact of shock incarceration on offenders was assessed in two major areas: (1) changes in offenders' attitudes, expectations, and outlook during incarceration (self-report/attitude data), and (2) performance during and adjustment to community supervision after incarceration (community supervision data). The self-report/attitude data include variables measuring criminal history, drinking and drug abuse, and attitudes toward the shock incarceration program, as well as demographic variables, such as age, race, employment, income, education, and military experience. The community supervision data contain information on offenders' behaviors during community supervision, such as arrests, absconding incidents, jail time, drug use, education and employment experiences, financial and residential stability, and contacts with community supervision officers, along with demographic variables, such as age and race. In addition to these key areas, more detailed data were collected in Louisiana, including a psychological assessment, a risk and needs assessment, and a community supervision follow-up at two different time periods (Parts 11-18). For most states, the subjects sampled in the self-report/attitude survey were different from those who were surveyed in the community supervision phase of data collection. Data collection practices and sample structures differed by state, and therefore the data files are organized to explore the impact of shock incarceration at the state level. For each state, the unit of analysis is the offender.Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06986.v1
    505
      
      
    t| Florida Self-Report/Attitude Data
    505
      
      
    t| Georgia Self-Report/Attitude Data
    505
      
      
    t| South Carolina Self-Report/Attitude Data
    505
      
      
    t| Oklahoma Self-Report/Attitude Data
    505
      
      
    t| Florida Community Supervision Data
    505
      
      
    t| Georgia Community Supervision Data
    505
      
      
    t| South Carolina Community Supervision Data
    505
      
      
    t| Oklahoma Community Supervision Data
    505
      
      
    t| Illinois Community Supervision Data
    505
      
      
    t| Texas Community Supervision Data
    505
      
      
    t| Louisiana Demographic Records for Community Supervision Data
    505
      
      
    t| Louisiana Demographic Records for Self-Report Data
    505
      
      
    t| Louisiana Psychological Data
    505
      
      
    t| Louisiana Self-Report Data
    505
      
      
    t| Louisiana Attitude Data
    505
      
      
    t| Louisiana Risk/Needs Assessment Data
    505
      
      
    t| Louisiana One-Year Community Supervision Follow-Up Data
    505
      
      
    t| Louisiana Two-Year Community Supervision Follow-Up Data
    567
      
      
    a| All states with shock incarceration programs and all youthful offenders serving sentences in state institutions.
    650
      
    7
    a| alcohol abuse 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| criminal histories 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| drug abuse 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| offenders 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| parole 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| prison inmates 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| probation 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| program evaluation 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| shock incarceration programs 2| icpsr
    653
    0
      
    a| ICPSR XVII.E. Social Institutions and Behavior, Crime and the Criminal Justice System
    653
    0
      
    a| NACJD III. Corrections
    700
    2
      
    a| MacKenzie, Doris Layton u| University of Maryland
    710
    2
      
    a| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
    830
      
    0
    a| ICPSR (Series) v| 6986
    856
    4
    0
    u| http://proxy01.its.virginia.edu/login?url=http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06986.v1
    999
      
      
    w| WEB l| INTERNET m| UVA-LIB t| INTERNET
▾See more
▴See less

Availability

Access Online