Item Details

Print View

On Party Platforms, Mandates, and Government Spending [electronic resource]

Gary King, Michael Laver
Format
Computer Resource; Online
Published
Ann Arbor, Mich. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] 1995
Edition
1995-12-20
Series
ICPSR
ICPSR (Series)
Access Restriction
AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
Abstract
This study is a reanalysis of Ian Budge and Richard Hofferbert's 1990 APSR article. The authors successfully replicate the original analysis, critique the interpretation of the causal effects, estimate a model that loosens a key assumption, and find that party platforms have small or nonexistent effects on government spending. The replication dataset includes Budge and Hofferbert's data that measure the relative frequency of many different issue areas mentioned in each party platform, as well as the spending figures in corresponding areas of the federal budget. Also included are programs to replicate Table 1 and Figure 1 in the article.Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01109.v1
Contents
Dataset
Description
Mode of access: Intranet.
Notes
Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2016-02-11.
Series Statement
ICPSR 1109
ICPSR (Series) 1109
Other Forms
Also available as downloadable files.
Copyright Not EvaluatedCopyright Not Evaluated
Technical Details
  • Staff View

    LEADER 01976cmm a2200349la 4500
    001 ICPSR01109
    003 MiAaI
    006 m f a u
    007 cr mn mmmmuuuu
    008 160211s1995 miu f a eng d
    035
      
      
    a| (MiAaI)ICPSR01109
    040
      
      
    a| MiAaI c| MiAaI
    245
    0
    0
    a| On Party Platforms, Mandates, and Government Spending h| [electronic resource] c| Gary King, Michael Laver
    250
      
      
    a| 1995-12-20
    260
      
      
    a| Ann Arbor, Mich. b| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] c| 1995
    490
      
      
    a| ICPSR v| 1109
    516
      
      
    a| Numeric
    538
      
      
    a| Mode of access: Intranet.
    500
      
      
    a| Title from ICPSR DDI metadata of 2016-02-11.
    506
      
      
    a| AVAILABLE. This study is freely available to the general public.
    530
      
      
    a| Also available as downloadable files.
    522
      
      
    a| United States
    520
    3
      
    a| This study is a reanalysis of Ian Budge and Richard Hofferbert's 1990 APSR article. The authors successfully replicate the original analysis, critique the interpretation of the causal effects, estimate a model that loosens a key assumption, and find that party platforms have small or nonexistent effects on government spending. The replication dataset includes Budge and Hofferbert's data that measure the relative frequency of many different issue areas mentioned in each party platform, as well as the spending figures in corresponding areas of the federal budget. Also included are programs to replicate Table 1 and Figure 1 in the article.Cf: http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01109.v1
    505
      
      
    t| Dataset
    650
      
    7
    a| government spending 2| icpsr
    650
      
    7
    a| political parties 2| icpsr
    653
    0
      
    a| ICPSR XVIII. Replication Datasets
    700
    2
      
    a| King, Gary u| Harvard University
    700
    2
      
    a| Laver, Michael u| Harvard University
    710
    2
      
    a| Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.
    830
      
    0
    a| ICPSR (Series) v| 1109
    856
    4
    0
    u| http://proxy.its.virginia.edu/login?url=http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR01109.v1
    999
      
      
    w| WEB l| INTERNET m| UVA-LIB t| INTERNET
▾See more
▴See less

Availability

Access Online